King's use of pathos, ethos, and logos
greatly appeal to his audience. The preachers, rabbis, and priests
that his letter is addressed to captures their angle of vision. He
uses multiple biblical examples to aid in their understanding of his
actions and his use of real-world models plucks at the heart strings
of these his rabbi brothers, such as the inclusion of the Holocaust.
His pathological appeal tugged at my heart in his use of stirring
stories of children's diluted feelings of inferiority because the
world was simply the way it was. Had King been writing to a group of
segregationalists, his essay would have looked very different because
piling guilt on those individuals would not have moved them to action
but only to anger. Being born in 1994 and having been taught the
groundbreaking acts of Martin Luther King, it does not come as a
surprise that he also supports his claims using ethical appeals. He
clearly states his reasons, includes his position as a member of the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and embellishes on the fact
that he followed the step-by-step on how to peacefully protest.
Friday, January 25, 2013
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Argument
This essay of persuasion is the same
argument that many college students have often considered, myself
included. The essay had many points that were understandable and gave
consideration for the audience. The author included reasons for his
exemption not based on laziness or financial issues but on issues of
timing and personal goals. The student clearly stated his reasons in
light of his personal integrity in the field of education. The only
argument against his claims is like that of arguing with a child. If
you give a toy to one child but not to another, the one child will
come to complain. Taking into consideration the fact that this
student gave a sound argument and demonstrated good work ethic, I
would have to vote in favor of this student's argument and give
exemption to his math course requirements.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
As A Writer
Why didn't anyone tell me that we were
not supposed to use conjunctions in formal papers until my senior
year of high school? What were my teachers thinking? Honestly, I have
never been amazing when it comes to writing but not even knowing the
basics has been a bit embarrassing. As a writer, the comfort that I
feel during the writing process comes when nobody has seen the paper
and I know that I can still get the details worked out to make it a
great paper. I can work with ideas and create my own in order to
compare mine with the opinions of others. I need to work on how well
I present these ideas, as in how the ideas flow together and make for
an intelligent read. Being formal in a paper has also been a struggle
as I tend to write as I would speak. Sometimes I find myself acting
out Sigmund Freud, in that I write in flow of consciousness without
stopping to think how my ideas are coagulating. I guess that is why I
am required to take two composition classes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)